What's the Point of Studying School Subjects?

At some point, almost every student has sat in a classroom and had the same thought.

Maybe it was during a History lesson on the causes of the First World War. Maybe it was staring at a Periodic Table trying to figure out why the valency of carbon matters to their life. Maybe it was sin and cos, or Shakespearean literature, or the water cycle, or the economic theories of Adam Smith.

The thought is always some version of the same thing: I am never going to use any of this.

And honestly? It's not a stupid thought. It's one of the most reasonable questions a student can ask. The problem is that it almost never gets a reasonable answer.

The Honest Surface Answer

Let's get this part out of the way first, because it deserves a straight answer.

Some of it is used directly — more than students think, but less than teachers claim.

The History you studied? Political analysts, journalists, diplomats, policy makers, lawyers — they use it constantly. Understanding why things happened in the past is one of the most practical tools for understanding what's happening right now. The 2008 financial crisis, the way pandemics spread, how wars start — these weren't new. They were patterns that people who knew History recognised early and people who didn't were blindsided by.

The Chemistry? Pharmacists, doctors, food scientists, environmental researchers, materials engineers — the Periodic Table is the alphabet of their entire field. The valency of carbon specifically is why plastics, fuels, medicines, and every living cell exist in the form they do.

The Maths — yes, the sin and cos and Pythagoras — shows up in architecture, engineering, animation, game design, sound engineering, medical imaging, GPS navigation. Every time your phone's camera adjusts depth, that's trigonometry running silently in the background.

Literature? The ability to read something carefully, figure out what it's actually saying beneath the surface, and understand why a person said it that way — that's one of the most underrated professional skills there is. Lawyers do it. Managers do it. Anyone who has ever had to read a contract, a report, or a difficult email and figure out what someone actually meant does it.

But here's the honest part: most students already suspect this answer isn't the complete one. Because knowing that someone somewhere uses this doesn't explain why you had to learn it.

So here's the more complete answer.

What School Is Actually Doing

School is not, at its core, about the content.

The content — the dates, the formulas, the theorems, the literary devices — is the material. What school is actually building, through that material, is the way you think.

Every time a student sits with a History essay and has to argue a position using evidence — not just state what happened, but explain why it happened and what it led to — they are building the ability to construct a logical argument. That skill does not stay in History class. It shows up in every conversation, negotiation, application, and decision they will ever make.

Every time a student works through a Chemistry problem — breaking it into steps, checking units, making sure the logic holds before moving to the next line — they are building the habit of systematic thinking. Not jumping to conclusions. Checking the work. That habit is the difference between a doctor who catches an error in a prescription and one who doesn't.

Every time a student reads a piece of Literature and has to explain why a character made a particular choice — not just what they did, but why, from inside their perspective — they are building the ability to understand people who aren't like them. In a world where most professional and personal problems come down to people not understanding each other, that is not a small thing.

And every time a student sits with a Maths problem that doesn't immediately give up its answer — tries something, gets it wrong, figures out where the logic broke, tries again — they are building the ability to persist through difficulty without giving up. Which is, arguably, the most important thing school can give anyone.

There is one fair criticism worth making, though.

School mostly gives you problems with one right answer. You either found the correct value for x or you didn't. The water cycle has specific stages. A historical date is fixed. Get it right and move on.

But real life almost never works this way. The problems that actually matter — what career to pursue, how to handle a situation at work, how to rebuild something that isn't working — rarely have a single correct answer. They have several possible approaches, different tradeoffs, and no answer key anywhere. These are called divergent problems. School, for the most part, trains you on convergent ones — problems where the answer either is or isn't right.

That gap is real. But convergent practice gives you something worth keeping: the discipline to reason your way toward an answer at all. Without it, a problem with no clear solution just produces panic. With it, you have structure — a way to break something complicated into steps, check your own thinking, and move forward carefully rather than guess. That structure is also exactly what half the current CBSE board exam is now testing — in ways most students were never warned about.

What the Research Actually Shows

In 2021, researchers published a study in one of the world's most respected science journals. They scanned the brains of teenagers in the UK who had stopped studying Maths at 16 — a choice students there are allowed to make. Then they compared those brains to students the same age who continued.

A year and a half later, the part of the brain responsible for reasoning and logical thinking had measurably weakened in the students who stopped Maths. And the important detail: that difference wasn't there before they stopped. It showed up after. Meaning it wasn't that weaker students dropped Maths. Dropping Maths weakened the students.

In plain terms: the brain needs to be worked. And working through a difficult problem — where you can't guess, can't fake it, have to actually figure it out — is one of the most direct workouts it gets.

What Each Subject Is Actually Building

Since the complaint is never really about one subject, it's worth being specific.

History is building your ability to trace cause and effect through complicated situations — to look at something messy and figure out what actually drove it, not just what it looks like on the surface. Every person who has ever had to understand a workplace situation, a family conflict, or a political event has used this.

Chemistry and Physics are building systematic thinking — the habit of not assuming, testing instead, and not moving forward until the current step is solid. This is what separates careful thinkers from careless ones, in any field.

Mathematics is building logical, step-by-step reasoning — the ability to move from what you know toward what you don't, without skipping steps or guessing. It's also the subject that most ruthlessly exposes whether understanding is real or just surface familiarity.

Literature is building the ability to read carefully, think about intention, and understand perspective — including perspectives you don't naturally share. This is one of the hardest skills to teach directly and one of the most useful to have.

Geography and Economics are building systems thinking — the understanding that things are connected, that a change in one place creates effects somewhere else, that the world is not made of isolated events.

None of these stay neatly inside the classroom they were learned in.

The Question Behind the Question

When a student says "I'm never going to use this" — they are almost always really saying something else.

Usually it's one of two things. Either: I've stopped understanding this and I want permission to stop trying. Or: Nobody has ever explained to me why this matters, and I'm tired of pretending I believe it does.

Both of these deserve a real response, not a lecture about the importance of education.

The first one — where confusion has turned into disengagement — is very fixable. But it requires going back to where things stopped making sense, not pushing harder on the chapter that's currently on the board. A student who genuinely understands what they're doing rarely asks what the point is. The question almost always comes from the confusion, not from a philosophical objection.

The second one is what this blog is trying to answer. And the answer isn't "trust us, it'll make sense later." It's that the subjects themselves are not the point. The thinking they build is the point. And that thinking goes everywhere.

FAQ

Q: My child says school is a waste of time and refuses to engage with any subject. What do I do?

First, take it seriously rather than dismissing it as a teenage phase. A child who is genuinely disengaged across all subjects is usually experiencing one of two things — either prolonged confusion in one or more subjects that has spread into a general feeling of defeat, or a mismatch between how they learn and how they're being taught. Both have practical solutions. The answer is rarely more pressure.

Q: Is there genuinely no point to some parts of the syllabus?

Honestly, some topics are included more for historical reasons than practical ones. But the way to identify those is not how pointless they feel — it's whether they're building any thinking skills at all. Even topics that seem entirely disconnected from real life are usually practising something: precision, logical sequencing, reading carefully, working with ambiguity. The question worth asking is not "will I use this fact?" but "what is this problem actually asking me to do?"

Q: My child is disengaged in Maths specifically and says it's useless. But their marks have been slipping since Class 7. Are these connected?

Very likely yes. Disengagement in Maths rarely comes from nowhere — it almost always follows a point where understanding broke down and the gap was never addressed. Class 7 is one of the most common places for that to happen, because the subject makes a sharp jump in what it demands from students. What actually happens at that stage, and why it catches so many students off guard, is worth understanding if this sounds familiar.

Q: How do I explain this to my child in a way they'll actually hear?

Stop trying to convince them the subject is useful. That argument rarely lands. Instead, ask them to show you a problem they got wrong recently and work through it with them — not to correct them, but to find the exact point where the logic broke down. When a student experiences what it feels like to actually understand something they were confused about, the "what's the point" question tends to quiet down on its own. Understanding is its own answer.

Q: My child is in Class 9 and this year everything seems pointless to them — studies, school, all of it. Is this normal?

Class 9 is a year where difficulty jumps significantly across almost every subject at once — and it also happens to be the year CBSE's exam format changed in ways that caught many students off guard. A sudden drop in engagement that coincides with the start of Class 9 is often a response to confusion, not a general attitude problem. What specifically changed in Class 9 from 2025 onwards is worth understanding if this feels like it came out of nowhere.

Q: Does studying harder subjects actually make you smarter overall?

The honest answer is: it builds specific kinds of thinking, which then show up in other areas. It's not a general intelligence boost. But the ability to think logically, construct an argument, understand a system, or work through something difficult without giving up — these do transfer. Not automatically and not instantly. But students who have genuinely worked through hard subjects think differently from those who haven't, and that difference shows up clearly over time.

The Bottom Line

"What's the point of studying all this?" is one of the most reasonable questions a student can ask. It deserves a real answer, not a dismissal.

The real answer is not that every topic will show up in your career. Some will. Most won't directly. But every subject that makes you genuinely think — that refuses to let you coast on memory alone — is building something in you that goes far beyond the classroom.

School is not teaching you History, or Chemistry, or Maths. It is using those subjects to teach you how to think. And that, unlike the specific content of any single lesson, goes with you everywhere.

Written by SP Home Tuition | Gurugram & Delhi
For personalised tuition across subjects — visit us here